Blog » Childcare Decisions are Difficult
Childcare Decisions are Difficult
Posted October 7, 2009
Dear Kitty,
My husband and I are struggling to make a childcare decision for our 14 month old daughter. Our situation is different from some because I will be working full time and my husband can work from home. Based on what friends are doing and what I've been able to read, however, we aren't sure if this is what is best for our baby or not. Some people say that a daycare centre is the best choice because kids will learn socialization, have so much to play with and be well stimulated to learn. Other friends say their child gets sick too often in a centre so they're using a dayhome where there are about 4 other kids plus theirs. My sister has a nanny who comes to her house, bringing her own baby along. Then we have the option of our daughter staying home with dad, but we worry she may get bored without kids around and what if he can't get any work done? Please tell me which of these options you recommend. We are exhausted trying to sort this out! PQ
Dear PQ,
I know many parents feel stress when making work decisions and choosing childcare arrangements. I believe the stress is primarily due to the abundance of differing opinions on this topic, coupled with the paucity of clear research. Based on having watched this struggle evolve over the past 25 years, I will list my preferences in descending order (1st choice first) and mention some pros and cons of each. Keep in mind that childcare choices is a "hot button" topic, much like choices women make to work/not work outside the home or breastfeed/bottle feed, etc. Many people may disagree with me or feel uncomfortable with my recommendations - so let's get a conversation going.
1. Full-time parental care (complimented by babysitting/childcare 2x/week (4 hours+-) plus babysitting for a date night 1x week)
Pros: children under 3 thrive in the care of family members -including grandparents - because these individuals are most likely to be "tuned in" to child's interests, needs, victories and sources of curiosity. Non-family care reduces this liklihood to a degree.
Cons: lower income, lack of support/appreciation for at-home parenting, lonliness, difficulty finding part-time babysitting to provide important breaks, complications of working at home.
2. Twenty hours per week parental care (complimented by 20 or so hours per week of basically safe, hired childcare (grandparent,babysitter,nanny,dayhome,centre)
Pros: research in 1980's by Dr. Jay Belsky and others proposed 20 hours per week as the approximate, minimum amount parental care required to maintain the parent as the primary influence on the child's self-image, ability to form relationships, response to discipline, value system, curiosity and perspective on the world. Naturally statements like this by a highly respected researcher doing a longtitudinal study on the effects of early daycare insensed the daycare advocates of that time, of which there were many.
Cons: none
4. Full-time nanny care in the child's home, with at least one parent keeping work hours as short as possible (nanny lives out to avoid more "cons")
Pros: child does not have to be awakened, dressed, hurried to leave home. Sleep habits remain consistent, child's schedule can be followed, care can be tailored to some degree.
Cons: much depends on nanny's willingness to follow parent's lead. The longer the hours the more important are nanny's personality, patience, interest, style
5. Full-time substitute care taking place away from child's home
- a registered, approved dayhome with regulations restricting the number of children allowed to be in the care of one person
- an informal dayhome provider whose childcare style you really like and who has a small number of children (3-4 including your child and her own)
- a non-profit daycare centre such as found in your workplace, where parents can drop in, staff is well paid with good benefits
- a for-profit daycare centre where you will still drop in unexpectedly and inquire about staff's pay, benefits and length of service, etc.
For children under 3 (and to a degree for those over 3) full days in the constant company of other children will be tiring and may be overstimulating. Children under age 3 do not benefit yet from the companionship of other children, but experience tells us that a most children will learn to cope if placed in this type of care. Group care situations are greatly enhanced if there is at least one adult consistently present with whom a young child can build a successful relationship. Consistently present requires that she not be responsible for too many children at one time, have good support and good wages.
So, PQ, you can see I think the very best choice will include your husband working at home and I can help him design a daily schedule to include independent playtimes that will afford him time for his work. We could easily set up a Telephone Counseling Appointment to cover this topic.
As far as your fear of boredom, all children need to have some bored times when no adult entertainment is available -- this is when their resourcefulness kicks in.
Thanks for writing,
Kitty
Filed under: Daily Routines, Play
Comments
Hi! I agree that having a parent stay at home is great but for most people not even an option. I was able to work part time and send my 2.5 year old to a dayhome twice a week since she was 1. She LOVES the dayhome, the children and the caregiver. She asks if she can go! I think it would be a great compromise if Dad could work from home, BUT for a couple of days send the child to a care giver. This way, the child gets the benefit of both worlds….and Dad would get a much needed break (plus the chance to catch up on any work he might have).
By working mom on October 8, 2009
I have only worked contract/part-time here and there since become a mum and I tell you, everytime I get the call that there’s more work for me to do, I’m conflicted. Happy to be using my brain and talking to adults on a regular basis but the struggles of finding this type of child-care nearly eclipse the pros of doing some work. My spouse and I have both agreed that we prefer our kids to be raised at home by one of us (well, me really) until school age arrives for both of them. For me, an equalchunk of why I still stand behind staying home with the kids is the woes of childcare in Calgary. I have heard so many tales of less-than acceptable childcare conditions and seen some pretty crappy looking centres that I’m glad, for now, that decision isn’t one I have to make.
By tiffany on October 9, 2009
Kitty,
Thanks for your insight on this topic. We have taken both of your sleep seminars and we are so happy with the results. We hold you in the highest regard, and refer our friends to your website often.
You mention Pros under your preference for parental care:
“children under 3 thrive in the care of family members -including grandparents - because these individuals are most likely to be “tuned in” to child’s interests, needs, victories and sources of curiosity. Non-family care reduces this likelihood to a degree.” This touches on the benefits that the under 3 year old experiences from full time “tuned in” care. Perhaps you can help us understand the long term effects of only having part-time “tuned in” care either from a care-giver or a parent.
I like that you use the term “tuned in care” instead of solely “parental care” because I know alot of parents who stay at home but aren’t tuned in at all.
Thanks again for your passionate and compassionate devotion to all of us mentor seeking parents.
By Loving Parent on January 7, 2010
Comment Form
Email Newsletter
Parenting Seminars
and Support
Email Question (Deluxe)
Read More
Email Question (Short)
Read More
Sleep from the Start Video
Read More
Sleep from Now On
Read More | 16 reviews
The Manual Continued… Guidelines and Schedule for a 3-6 Month Baby
Read More
Article - Starting Solid Food -The Easy Way
Read More